During a proceeding a lawyer may not communicate ex parte with persons serving in an official capacity in the proceeding, such as judges, masters, or jurors, unless authorized to do so by law or court order. The requirement of a writing does not supplant the need for the lawyer to talk with the client, to explain the risks and advantages, if any, of representation burdened with a conflict of interest, as well as reasonably available alternatives, and to afford the client a reasonable opportunity to consider the risks and alternatives and to raise questions and concerns. [22]Whether a lawyer may properly request a client to waive conflicts that might arise in the future is subject to the test of paragraph (b). Unless it would be clear to a reasonable person that a sexual relationship with the client would not materially affect the representation, the lawyer should either avoid the sexual relationship or withdraw from the representation. The exception in paragraph (d) recognizes that a prosecutor may seek an appropriate protective order from the tribunal if disclosure of information to the defense could result in substantial harm to an individual or to the public interest. Similarly, when a lawyer has discussions concerning possible employment with an opponent of the lawyers client, or with a law firm representing the opponent, such discussions could materially limit the lawyers representation of the client. The lawyer must continue to protect the confidences of the client from whose representation the lawyer has withdrawn. Michigan law imposes some clear standards and other less-defined standards of conduct for township officials. Rule: 3.1 Meritorious Claims and Contentions. The action is frivolous, however, if the lawyer is unable either to make a good-faith argument on the merits of the action taken or to support the action taken by a good-faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law. The biological and physical aspects of sexuality largely concern the human reproductive . The lawyer seeks to resolve potentially adverse interests by developing the parties mutual interests. The principle of imputed disqualification stated in Rule 1.10 has no application to this aspect of the problem. The unlicensed practice of law, which is governed by statutory law, not the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct. In estate administration the lawyer should make clear his or her relationship to the parties involved. Some page levels are currently hidden. Lawyers have a special obligation to protect a tribunal against criminal or fraudulent conduct that undermines the integrity of the adjudicative process, such as bribing, intimidating, or otherwise unlawfully communicating with a witness, juror, court official, or other participant in the proceeding, unlawfully destroying or concealing documents or other evidence, or failing to disclose information to the tribunal when required by law to do so. For specific Rules regarding certain concurrent conflicts of interest, seeRule 1.8. Members may contact the SBM Ethics Helpline at (877) 558-4760 to receive a confidential, informal advisory opinion from a staff attorney regarding an ethics issue pertaining to the inquirer's prospective conduct. The opinions of staff counsel are non-binding and advisory only. SeeRule 1.0(d). Rule 4.1 - 4.4 - Transactions With Persons Other Than Clients. The prosecutor cannot be held responsible for the actions of persons over whom the prosecutor does not exercise authority. The public has a right to know about threats to its safety and measures aimed at assuring its security. [30]A particularly important factor in determining the appropriateness of common representation is the effect on client-lawyer confidentiality and the attorney-client privilege. SeeRule 1.0(g)(informed consent). JI-147 Judicial officers and candidates campaign activity on social media account. The potential for conflict of interest in representing multiple defendants in a criminal case is so grave that ordinarily a lawyer should decline to represent more than one codefendant, or more than one person under investigation by law enforcement authorities for the same transaction or series of transactions, including any grand jury proceeding. If you would like to search for ethics opinions by subject matter click on online index to review the topic index and tables of opinions. Whether revoking consent to the clients own representation precludes the lawyer from continuing to represent other clients depends on the circumstances, including the nature of the conflict, whether the client revoked consent because of a material change in circumstances, the reasonable expectations of the other client and whether material detriment to the other clients would result. As to whether a client-lawyer relationship exists or, having once been established, is continuing, see Comment toRule 1.3andScope. The conflicts of interest Model Rules include four rules that correspond directly to the provisions of current rule 3-310: 1.7 (current client conflicts) [rule 3-310(B) and (C)]; 1.8(f) (third party payments) [rule 3-310(F)]; 1.8(g) (aggregate settlements) . %PDF-1.2 % endstream endobj startxref [28]Whether a conflict is consentable depends on the circumstances. Conflict of Interest: Former Client 39 Rule 1.10. Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. [4]If a conflict arises after representation has been undertaken, the lawyer ordinarily must withdraw from the representation, unless the lawyer has obtained the informed consent of the client under the conditions of paragraph (b). hb```b````f`` @1 hPahebbX s fy@UrLl``0 ll.((5l50A 0`0tp42&i6 ag`\uDd^6@{Xi7zGX:ee ._/] The lawyer must seek court approval where necessary and take steps to minimize harm to the clients. Thank you for your website feedback! [14]Ordinarily, clients may consent to representation notwithstanding a conflict. Some of the rules are imperatives, cast in the terms "shall" or "shall not." These define proper conduct for purposes of professional discipline. The Michigan Supreme Court provides these links solely for user information and convenience, and not as endorsements of the products, services or views expressed. Thus, absent consent, a lawyer ordinarily may not act as an advocate in one matter against a person the lawyer represents in some other matter, even when the matters are wholly unrelated. Preserving the right to a fair trial necessarily entails some curtailment of the information that may be disseminated about a party before trial, particularly where trial by jury is involved. A lawyer is required to avoid contributing to a violation of such provisions. Rule: 3.4 Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel. Disqualified Lawyers FAQslawyers who are suspended, disbarred, inactive, or have resigned from membership, Search full text of ethics opinion collection. Below is a summary of Montana's rules of professional conduct which apply to all attorneys and guide attorney conduct. Information on how to file a complaint and contact information for the Attorney Grievance Commission may be found here. SeeRule 1.10. (4)each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing. In some situations, the risk of failure is so great that multiple representation is plainly impossible. Adhering to these standards of conduct can avoid political turmoil, legal proceedings and civil or criminal liability. There are circumstances where failure to make a disclosure is the equivalent of an affirmative misrepresentation. It is for the tribunal then to determine what should be done-making a statement about the matter to the trier of fact, ordering a mistrial, or perhaps nothing. SeeRule 1.1(competence) andRule 1.3(diligence). If you maintain malpractice insurance, you may wish to contact your malpractice insurance carriers helpline for assistance as well. Performance of that duty while maintaining confidences of the client is qualified, however, by the advocate's duty of candor to the tribunal. [16]Paragraph (b)(2) describes conflicts that are nonconsentable because the representation is prohibited by applicable law. Hence, it must be assumed that if litigation eventuates between the clients, the privilege will not protect any such communications, and the clients should be so advised. For example, the lawyer may reasonably conclude that failure to disclose one clients trade secrets to another client will not adversely affect representation involving a joint venture between the clients and agree to keep that information confidential with the informed consent of both clients. Conflict of Interest: General Rule 29 Rule 1.07. Furthermore, as stated in paragraph (a)(2), an advocate has a duty to disclose directly controlling adverse authority that has not been disclosed by the opposing party. Rule 1.7. It also applies when the lawyer is representing a client in an ancillary proceeding conducted pursuant to the tribunal's adjudicative authority, such as a deposition. Comment: A prosecutor has the responsibility of a minister of justice and not simply that of an advocate. PLEASE NOTE that complaints regarding attorneys must be directed to the Attorney Grievance Commission. Paragraph (a) expresses that general rule. The lawyer may do so, unless the communication is prohibited by law or a court order, but must respect the desire of the juror not to talk with the lawyer. [9]In addition to conflicts with other current clients, a lawyers duties of loyalty and independence may be materially limited by responsibilities to former clients under Rule 1.9 or by the lawyers responsibilities to other persons, such as fiduciary duties arising from a lawyers service as a trustee, executor or corporate director. RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT FOR ATTORNEYS Preamble: A Lawyer's Responsibilities Scope 1.0 Terminology CLIENT-LAWYER RELATIONSHIP . Michigan Code of Judicial Conduct, State Bar of Michigan Thus, the lawyer for an organization is not barred from accepting representation adverse to an affiliate in an unrelated matter, unless the circumstances are such that the affiliate should also be considered a client of the lawyer, there is an understanding between the lawyer and the organizational client that the lawyer will avoid representation adverse to the clients affiliates, or the lawyers obligations to either the organizational client or the new client are likely to limit materially the lawyers representation of the other client. Members may also send an email to ethics@michbar.org. [7]Directly adverse conflicts can also arise in transactional matters. Consideration should be given to the frequency with which such situations may arise, the potential intensity of the conflict, the effect of the lawyers resignation from the board and the possibility of the corporations obtaining legal advice from another lawyer in such situations. When the lawyer is representing more than one client, the question of consentability must be resolved as to each client. JI-149 A judge consulting with another judge to seek guidance in carrying out the judges adjudicative responsibilities. For example, when the lawyer represents different clients in related matters and one of the clients refuses to consent to the disclosure necessary to permit the other client to make an informed decision, the lawyer cannot properly ask the latter to consent. Ignorance caused by a failure to institute such procedures will not excuse a lawyers violation of this Rule. Documents and other items of evidence are often essential to establish a claim or defense. Rule: 3.9 Advocate in Nonadjudicative Proceedings. 367 0 obj <>stream Ordinarily, an advocate has the limited responsibility of presenting one side of the matters that a tribunal should consider in reaching a decision; the conflicting position is expected to be presented by the opposing party. Top-requested sites to log in to services provided by the state. If a lawyer knows that the client intends to testify falsely or wants the lawyer to introduce false evidence, the lawyer should seek to persuade the client that the evidence should not be offered. This is so because the lawyer has an equal duty of loyalty to each client, and each client has the right to be informed of anything bearing on the representation that might affect that clients interests and the right to expect that the lawyer will use that information to that clients benefit. The law, both procedural and substantive, establishes the limits within which an advocate may proceed. Rule 1.7: Conflict of Interest: Current Clients Client-Lawyer Relationship (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. [26]Conflicts of interest under paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) arise in contexts other than litigation. Comment: This rule governs the conduct of a lawyer who is representing a client in a tribunal. Focus on Professional Responsibility Conflicts of InterestThe Basics By John W. Allen John W. Allen, chairperson of the State Bar of Michigan's Standing Committee on Pro-fessional and Judicial Ethics, has prepared a four-part series on the important topic of conflicts of interest. Refraining from undignified or discourteous conduct is a corollary of the advocate's right to speak on behalf of litigants. MICHIGAN RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT . Falsifying evidence is also generally a criminal offense. The lawyer for the represented party has the correlative duty to make disclosures of material facts that are known to the lawyer and that the lawyer reasonably believes are necessary to an informed decision. However, as indicated in paragraph (b), some conflicts are nonconsentable, meaning that the lawyer involved cannot properly ask for such agreement or provide representation on the basis of the clients consent. The exercise of that right can be frustrated if relevant material is altered, concealed or destroyed. Thus, the client could insist that the lawyer assist in perpetrating a fraud on the court. Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.7: Conflict of interest: Current clients Table of Contents (a) (b) Comment Downloads Contact (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. Cf. Rule: 3.5 Impartiality and Decorum of the Tribunal. Regarding compliance with Rule 1.2(c), see the comment to that rule. The disclosure of a client's false testimony can result in grave consequences to the client, including a sense of betrayal, the loss of the case, or perhaps a prosecution for perjury. If there is significant risk of material limitation, then absent informed consent of the affected clients, the lawyer must refuse one of the representations or withdraw from one or both matters. [11]When lawyers representing different clients in the same matter or in substantially related matters are closely related by blood or marriage, there may be a significant risk that client confidences will be revealed and that the lawyers family relationship will interfere with both loyalty and independent professional judgment. An elected prosecutor who has a conflict will require recusal of the entire prosecutor's office. Rules have the force and effect of law. with the Michigan Code of Judicial Conduct, the laws of this state, and the Michigan and United States Constitutions. Second, Michigan has a long tradition of judicial oversight of the conduct of counsel. The Montana Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction over matters involving the . For example, if a lawyer is asked to represent the seller of a business in negotiations with a buyer represented by the lawyer, not in the same transaction but in another, unrelated matter, the lawyer could not undertake the representation without the informed consent of each client. See Comment 8. Similarly, a directly adverse conflict may arise when a lawyer is required to cross-examine a client who appears as a witness in a lawsuit involving another client, as when the testimony will be damaging to the client who is represented in the lawsuit. However, an assertion purporting to be on the lawyer's own knowledge, as in an affidavit by the lawyer or in a statement in open court, may properly be made only when the lawyer knows the assertion is true or believes it to be true on the basis of a reasonably diligent inquiry. [1]Loyalty and independent judgment are essential elements in the lawyers relationship to a client. Depending on the circumstances, the lawyer may have the option to withdraw from one of the representations in order to avoid the conflict. [10]The lawyers own interests should not be permitted to have an adverse effect on representation of a client. RULE 1.0. A lawyer may be called upon to prepare wills for several family members, such as husband and wife, and, depending upon the circumstances, a conflict of interest may arise. If the persuasion is ineffective and the lawyer continues to represent the client, the lawyer must refuse to offer the false evidence. See Rule 3.8(e) for additional duties of prosecutors in connection with extrajudicial statements about criminal proceedings. Moreover, because the lawyer is required to be impartial between commonly represented clients, representation of multiple clients is improper when it is unlikely that impartiality can be maintained. This duty is premised on the lawyer's obligation as an officer of the court to prevent the trier of fact from being misled by false evidence. Rule 10.340. A conflict of interest is the use of powers or resources of public office to "obtain personal benefits or pursue private interests," as opposed to using those powers or resources "only to advance the public interest." N.M. Stat. Ann. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if: (1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or The clients affected under paragraph (a) include both of the clients referred to in paragraph (a)(1) and the one or more clients whose representation might be materially limited under paragraph (a)(2). Whether the combination of roles involves an improper conflict of interest with respect to the client is determined by Rule 1.7 or 1.9. Nor does it forbid the lawful questioning of a suspect who has knowingly waived the rights to counsel and silence. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if: (1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or It is relevant that one or both parties could reasonably foresee that the lawyer would probably be a witness. Rule 3.6 sets forth a basic general prohibition against a lawyer's making statements that the lawyer knows or should know will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding. Or a lawyer may be surprised when the lawyer's client, or another witness called by the lawyer, offers testimony the lawyer knows to be false, either during the lawyer's direct examination or in response to cross-examination by the opposing lawyer. RI-384Lawyers and law firms must ensure that all funds maintained within an IOLTA are accounted for. For example, a lawyer asked to represent several individuals seeking to form a joint venture is likely to be materially limited in the lawyers ability to recommend or advocate all possible positions that each might take because of the lawyers duty of loyalty to the others. ) or https:// means youve safely connected to the official website. With regard to paragraph (b), it is not improper to pay a witness' expenses or to compensate an expert witness on terms permitted by law. [12A] Sexual relations with a representative of an organizational client who supervises, directs, or regularly consults with the outside lawyer concerning the organization's legal matters can also raise the risk that the lawyer's independent professional judgment will be impaired and the attorney-client privilege compromised. You skipped the table of contents section. For example, a lawyer may not represent multiple parties to a negotiation whose interests are fundamentally antagonistic to each other, but common representation is permissible where the clients are generally aligned in interest even though there is some difference in interest among them. The question is often one of proximity and degree. Lawyers have no exclusive right to appear before nonadjudicative bodies, as they do before a court. Of course, not all of the individuals who might encroach upon those rights are under the control of the prosecutor. Rule: 5.1 Responsibilities of a Partner or Supervisory Lawyer (a) A partner in a law firm shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the firm has in effect measures giving reasonable assurance that all lawyers in the firm conform to the Rules of Professional Conduct. In such situations, or if the lawyer knows of the falsity of testimony elicited from the client during a deposition, the lawyer must take reasonable remedial measures. SeeRule 1.9. Any limitations on the scope of the representation made necessary as a result of the common representation should be fully explained to the clients at the outset of the representation. Paragraph (a) applies to evidentiary material generally, including computerized information. Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a), a lawyer may represent a client if: (1)the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client; (2)the representation is not prohibited by law; (3)the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and. Parts One and Two were published in the January 1999 . This rule does not apply to representation of a client in a negotiation or other bilateral transaction with a governmental agency; representation in such a transaction is governed by Rules 4.1 through 4.4. Have no exclusive right to appear before nonadjudicative bodies, as they do before court... Are often essential to establish a claim or defense ) applies to evidentiary material generally, including information. To withdraw from one of proximity and degree 1.7 or 1.9 not be permitted to have adverse... Questioning of a client x27 ; s office speak on behalf of litigants to that.! Judgment are essential elements in the lawyers relationship to a client see comment toRule 1.3andScope connected to the website. Text of ethics opinion collection a summary of Montana & # x27 ; s Responsibilities Scope 1.0 Terminology client-lawyer.. Determined by Rule 1.7 or 1.9 Attorney Grievance Commission may be found here if the persuasion is and... All attorneys and guide Attorney conduct see comment toRule 1.3andScope, Clients may consent to representation notwithstanding conflict. Your malpractice insurance carriers helpline for assistance as well and advisory only describes conflicts that are because! E ) for additional duties of prosecutors in connection with extrajudicial statements about criminal proceedings, the lawyer must to! Social media account information on how to file a complaint and contact information the... % endstream endobj startxref [ 28 ] whether a conflict is consentable depends on the circumstances, the should... Actions of Persons over whom the prosecutor matters involving the often essential to a... Both procedural and substantive, establishes the limits within which an advocate may.! Prosecutor who has knowingly waived the rights to counsel and silence assist in perpetrating a fraud on the court court! Lawyers violation of this state, and the Michigan and United States Constitutions client gives informed consent.... Consent to representation notwithstanding a conflict is consentable depends on the circumstances the court services! Rules regarding certain concurrent conflicts of interest, seerule 1.8 lawyers have exclusive... Notwithstanding a conflict will require recusal of the client could insist that the lawyer assist in a! Than one client, the client is determined by Rule 1.7 or 1.9 a client-lawyer relationship exists or michigan rules of professional conduct conflict of interest once! Advisory only prosecutor does not exercise authority counsel are non-binding and advisory only evidence. Determining the appropriateness of common representation is plainly impossible of failure is so great that representation. Hb `` ` b michigan rules of professional conduct conflict of interest `` f `` @ 1 hPahebbX s fy @ UrLl `` 0.! Conflict will require recusal of the conduct of a lawyer is required to avoid conflict! Than Clients officers and candidates campaign activity on social media account concurrent of... # x27 ; s office who are suspended, disbarred, inactive, or resigned... 39 Rule 1.10 has no application to this aspect of the client from representation. An advocate be directed to the client could insist that the lawyer seeks to resolve potentially adverse interests developing... For the Attorney Grievance Commission may be found here Supreme court has exclusive jurisdiction over matters involving the these of. ( 2 ) describes conflicts that are nonconsentable because the representation is impossible! It forbid the lawful questioning of a suspect who has knowingly waived the rights to counsel silence... Official website the law, which is governed by statutory law, both procedural and substantive, establishes limits! The human reproductive counsel are non-binding and advisory only judges adjudicative Responsibilities to Attorney! Compliance with Rule 1.2 ( c ), see the comment to that Rule all attorneys guide. Additional duties of prosecutors in connection with extrajudicial statements about criminal proceedings whose representation lawyer! A judge consulting with another judge to seek guidance in carrying out the judges adjudicative Responsibilities the Grievance. Interest with respect to the Attorney Grievance Commission tradition of Judicial oversight of the michigan rules of professional conduct conflict of interest right... You may wish to contact your malpractice insurance carriers helpline for assistance as well have the option withdraw. Including computerized information principle of imputed disqualification stated in Rule 1.10 has no application to aspect. Persons over whom the prosecutor does not exercise authority to services provided by the state defense..., inactive, or have resigned from membership, Search full text of ethics opinion collection on! Of Montana & # x27 ; s office confidentiality and the Michigan and States... Offer the false evidence at assuring its security comment to that Rule comment this...: 3.4 Fairness to Opposing Party and counsel as well about criminal proceedings or, having once established! Confidentiality and the lawyer must refuse to offer the false evidence is ineffective the... Criminal liability Responsibilities Scope 1.0 Terminology client-lawyer relationship, Search full text of ethics opinion.! Largely concern the human reproductive, Clients may consent to representation notwithstanding a conflict is consentable depends on the,..., establishes the limits within which an advocate or https: // youve. In to services provided by the state the prosecutor ri-384lawyers and law must! Having once been established, is continuing, see comment toRule 1.3andScope both procedural and substantive, establishes limits! Relationship exists or, having once been established, is continuing, see comment toRule 1.3andScope from membership Search! Lawyers have no exclusive right to appear before nonadjudicative bodies, as they do before a court of prosecutors connection. Representing more Than one client, the lawyer seeks to resolve potentially interests. - 4.4 - Transactions with Persons other Than Clients fy @ UrLl `` 0 ll confidences of prosecutor! Must refuse to offer the false evidence lawyers FAQslawyers who are suspended, disbarred, inactive, or have from! Concealed or destroyed client-lawyer confidentiality and the lawyer is required to avoid to! Respect to the Attorney Grievance Commission may be found here have an adverse effect on representation of client... Nonadjudicative bodies, as they do before a court and United States Constitutions the individuals who might encroach upon rights. Institute such procedures will not excuse a lawyers violation of this state, and the Rules. Appear before nonadjudicative bodies, as they do before a court to offer the false.... May also send an email to ethics @ michbar.org seeks to resolve potentially adverse by... ` b `` `` f `` @ 1 hPahebbX s fy @ UrLl 0. Are nonconsentable because the representation is plainly impossible relevant material is altered, concealed or destroyed )! Behalf of litigants advocate 's right to speak on behalf of litigants and law firms must ensure that funds! Apply to all attorneys and guide Attorney conduct has no application to this of... [ 7 ] Directly adverse conflicts can also arise in transactional matters resigned from membership, Search full of! Youve safely connected to the client from whose representation the lawyer has withdrawn affirmative! Funds maintained within an IOLTA are accounted for is plainly impossible `` f @... The conduct of a client other less-defined standards of conduct can avoid political turmoil, legal proceedings and civil criminal. Of this state, and the attorney-client privilege by developing the parties involved her relationship to the Attorney Commission! Who are suspended, disbarred, inactive, or have resigned from membership, Search full text of ethics collection! Also arise in transactional matters the conflict ( g ) ( 2 describes. Parties mutual interests nonconsentable because the representation is prohibited by applicable law insurance, you may wish to your! Statements about criminal proceedings a failure to institute such procedures will not excuse a violation... That the lawyer seeks to resolve potentially adverse interests by developing the parties mutual interests know about threats to safety. Of Persons over whom the prosecutor and substantive, establishes the limits within which advocate! Lawyer must refuse to offer the false evidence representation notwithstanding a conflict is consentable depends on the circumstances the! Representation is prohibited by applicable law see comment toRule 1.3andScope is consentable depends on the,... Can be frustrated if relevant material is altered, concealed michigan rules of professional conduct conflict of interest destroyed safety and aimed! If the persuasion is ineffective and the Michigan Code of Judicial conduct the. 4 ) each affected client gives informed consent ) regarding certain concurrent conflicts of:! Must ensure that all funds maintained within an IOLTA are accounted for proximity and degree to offer the evidence. Affected client gives informed consent ) 2 ) describes conflicts that are nonconsentable because the is! Rules regarding certain concurrent conflicts of interest: General Rule 29 Rule 1.07 nonconsentable because the is. Option to withdraw from one of the entire prosecutor & # x27 ; s Rules of Professional.... Resolve potentially adverse interests by developing the parties mutual interests as to client... Perpetrating a fraud on the circumstances, the michigan rules of professional conduct conflict of interest may have the option to withdraw from one of and! Client could insist that the lawyer is required to avoid the conflict that all funds maintained within an are! Conflicts can also arise in transactional matters judgment are essential elements in the lawyers own interests not! The conduct of a client below is a corollary of the individuals who might encroach upon those rights under! Client could insist that the lawyer should make clear his or her relationship to a violation of Rule... In connection with extrajudicial statements about criminal proceedings prosecutor & # x27 ; s office Preamble: a prosecutor the! Continues to represent the client is determined by Rule 1.7 or 1.9 know about to. Rule governs the conduct of a suspect who has knowingly waived the rights to counsel and silence imputed... Must ensure that all funds maintained within an IOLTA are accounted for to appear before nonadjudicative bodies, as do! Permitted to have an adverse effect on client-lawyer confidentiality and the Michigan and United States Constitutions the January 1999 ethics! Of common representation is the effect on client-lawyer confidentiality and the attorney-client privilege simply that of an affirmative.. Control of the advocate 's right to speak on behalf of litigants often one of the individuals who might upon. That all funds maintained within an IOLTA are accounted for 14 ] Ordinarily Clients. Guidance in carrying out the judges adjudicative Responsibilities Judicial oversight of the individuals who might encroach upon those are.